And water is wet
So advertising builds brand awareness? Duh. I figured that companies were spending all that money on 30-second spots for a reason.
But so what?
The important point in the article is buried at the end.
That's right; it's the role of parents to help their kids interpret the information their children receive, including that from advertisements. They're also supposed to exercise control over their children's choices, because the little tykes aren't yet capable of rationally assessing the input they receive. If parents' role was unnecessary, we could just hand the kids Visa cards and be done with it.
Of course, that's not the lesson the professional bedwetters draw from the article. They want legal restrictions placed on advertising because kids might develop preferences based on what they see and hear.
I repeat, it's the role of parents to guide their children. We don't structure the world to fit the presumed needs of the wee ones--we live in a world made for adults, and we prepare our kids to fit into it through all the arguments and tantrums.
If that's too difficult a role to play, don't have children. It's as easy as that.
But so what?
The important point in the article is buried at the end.
Pradeep Chintagunta, a University of Chicago marketing professor, said a fairer comparison might have gauged kids' preferences for the McDonald's label versus another familiar brand, such as Mickey Mouse.
"I don't think you can necessarily hold this against" McDonald's, he said, since the goal of marketing is to build familiarity and sell products.
He noted that parents play a strong role in controlling food choices for children so young.
That's right; it's the role of parents to help their kids interpret the information their children receive, including that from advertisements. They're also supposed to exercise control over their children's choices, because the little tykes aren't yet capable of rationally assessing the input they receive. If parents' role was unnecessary, we could just hand the kids Visa cards and be done with it.
Of course, that's not the lesson the professional bedwetters draw from the article. They want legal restrictions placed on advertising because kids might develop preferences based on what they see and hear.
The study is likely to stir more debate over the movement to restrict ads to kids. It comes less than a month after 11 major food and drink companies, including McDonald's, announced new curbs on marketing to children under 12.
I repeat, it's the role of parents to guide their children. We don't structure the world to fit the presumed needs of the wee ones--we live in a world made for adults, and we prepare our kids to fit into it through all the arguments and tantrums.
If that's too difficult a role to play, don't have children. It's as easy as that.
posted by J.D. Tuccille at
8:53 PM
1 Comments:
"If that's too difficult a role to play, don't have children. It's as easy as that."
I really wish more people had this philosophy. I have met way to many parents who complain about almost everything. They feel that it is someone else's responsibility to control what their children watch on TV or what their children eat.
That having been said we found that if you live your life in a principled manner, it is remarkably easy to influence children. With regard to junk food and other "unhealthy" desires, first teach them about money, then have them earn some, then when they want anything you do not favor, tell them they have to use their own money. It is really amazing how fast they learn that they have better things to spend their money on than McDonald's Happy Meals.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home