Barr holds strong -- if Palin doesn't steal his thunder
Libertarian Presidential candidate Bob Barr is holding on to strong poll numbers in ten battleground states, according to a recent Zogby poll.
His best state remains New Hampshire, where he's at 11%, but he's showing strong support in enough states to potentially make a big difference in November's general election. He's pulling 10% in Nevada and 8% in both Colorado and Ohio.
The big question is whether that support -- or any significant share of it -- will remain firm as the campaign turns serious and voters are bombarded with messages to not "waste" their vote by choosing a candidate they actually support rather than one or the other of the Coke and Pepsi of politics. (Isn't there room for an RC Cola?)
Complicating the race is the -- probably calculated -- sudden weird vibe to the effect that Sarah Palin is a sort-of libertarian.
Don't get me wrong -- I think Palin was a smart pick for McCain. She's an unexpected break from the smarmy, rich, old, white-guy brand the GOP has been peddling. She's actually owned businesses that have to navigate the tax and regulatory policies passed down by the likes of McCain, Obama and Biden. She seems like a real person with interests in common with people who spend their lives outside the Beltway -- especially when compared to ... well ... McCain, Obama, and Biden. She also has more executive experience actually managing things than the the other three major-party contenders combined.
But that doesn't make her a principled believer in personal freedom in all matters, strictly limited government as, at best, a necessary evil, and the rights of the individual as the primary concern of any political system.
Although I think Alaska politicians probably start off closer to that point than their counterparts in most places.
But I can't help but thinking that marketing Sarah Palin as something like a younger, prettier, Ron Paul may just have something to do with polls like the one released by Zogby.
Labels: popularity contest
1 Comments:
It is interesting that you consider NH a potential Barr stronghold when it isn't at all clear that Barr is even going to be ON the NH ballot...
Prof. George Phillies, the NHLP Presidential Nominee (chosen well before Barr crawled out from under his rock) is at present definitely on - he has turned in sufficient petition signatures, and gotten his paperwork from the NH Secretary of State... Note that NH law explicitly does NOT allow substitution, which is why the LPNH nominated Phillies early so that they would have time to get him and all their other candidates on the ballot (an action which failed in the past when they waited for LPUS to determine the presidential nominee)
Not all the deadlines have passed, so Barr may still have sufficient signatures to qualify for the ballot, but there is reason to believe he may be a few hundred signatures short in both NH Districts...(especially District 2)
This may be the reason that rumours are flying about that Barr and / or the LNC may be filing litigation to bump Phillies off the ballot and steal his slot.
There will definitely be doubts raised about the legitimacy of any such suit, and George has pledged that he intends to fight it rather than go down quietly - could get interesting... (This is an issue worth watching)
As a potential LP Presidential Elector who can't stomach the thought of casting a general or electoral vote for Barr, I certainly hope that George stays on the ballot in NH so that at least folks in NH have a chance to cast a vote for a Libertarian.
ART
LPMA Operations Facilitator
LPMA Presidential Elector, NOT voting for Barr
Speaking for myself
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home